Skip to main content

wired output of the combination of $.each and jQuery.inArray function



My complete code:







jQuery.extend({



combinationCheck: function (p1position) {



var Combination = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8];

Combination[0] = [1, 2, 3];

Combination[1] = [4, 5, 6];

Combination[2] = [7, 8, 9];

Combination[3] = [1, 4, 7];

Combination[4] = [2, 5, 8];

Combination[5] = [4, 6, 8];

Combination[6] = [1, 5, 9];

Combination[7] = [3, 5, 7];





$.each(p1position, function (index, value) {



var num = value;



if ($.inArray(String(value), Combination[1]) != '-1') {

alert("there");

}

else {

alert("not there");

}



});

});







so it works. If I were to set num to 5, it alerts "is there", and for 8 --> "not there". but the problem is I have another array.







p1position = [1,5];







and go through the array..







$.each(p1position,function(index,value){

var num = value;

//then call the jQuery.inArray function as written above, it always return not there. even though 5 is in the Combination[1] array.

});







I am so confused of trying to solve this problem for hours.


Comments

  1. The specific problem with your code that you're asking about is that you're turning the value into a string before the check:

    if ($.inArray(String(value), Combination[1]) != '-1') {
    // ^^^^^^^^^^^^^


    inArray does an === (strict equality) check, and "1" !== 1. That line should read:

    if ($.inArray(value, Combination[1]) !== -1) {


    Changes:


    Don't turn the value into a string.
    Compare the result with -1 (a number), not "-1" (a string). inArray returns a number.
    Use !== rather than != (this is mostly a matter of style, you can use != if you prefer).




    There are several other problems with that code, though.


    You're missing a }, so the code you say is your complete code doesn't parse.
    You're re-creating Combination every time the combinationCheck is called. If your goal is to create a Tic-Tac-Toe game, you're going to need to be able to retain the Combination state between checks.


    Here's a fairly minimal set of fixes:

    (function() {
    var Combination = [
    [1, 2, 3],
    [4, 5, 6],
    [7, 8, 9],
    [1, 4, 7],
    [2, 5, 8],
    [4, 6, 8],
    [1, 5, 9],
    [3, 5, 7]
    ];

    jQuery.extend({

    combinationCheck: function (p1position) {

    $.each(p1position, function (index, value) {

    if ($.inArray(value, Combination[1]) !== -1) {
    alert(value + " is there");
    }
    else {
    alert(value + " is NOT there");
    }

    });
    }
    });

    })();


    ...which given:

    jQuery.combinationCheck([1, 5]);


    ...reports that 1 is not found, but 5 is.

    Live copy

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Android emulator

I have a 2.67 GHz Celeron processor, 1.21 GB of RAM on a x86 Windows XP Professional machine. My understanding is that the Android emulator should start fairly quickly on such a machine, but for me it does not. I have followed all instructions in setting up the IDE, SDKs, JDKs and such and have had some success in staring the emulator quickly but is very particulary. How can I, if possible, fix this problem?

Java Urban Myths

Along the line of C++ Urban Myths and Perl Myths : What are the Java Urban Myths? That is, the ideas and conceptions about Java that are common but have no actual roots in reality . As a Java programmer, what ideas held by your fellow Java programmers have you had to disprove so often that you've come to believe they all learned at the feet of the same drunk old story-teller? Ideally, you would express these myths in a single sentence, and include an explanation of why they are false.