Skip to main content

What does Java compiler interprets by `(byte) + (char) - (int) + (long) - 1`?



Possible Duplicate:

Weird java behavior with casts to primitive types




Why does this code in Java,




int i = (byte) + (char) - (int) + (long) - 1;
System.out.println(i);



prints 1? Why does it even compile?



Source: Java Code Geeks


Source: Tips4allCCNA FINAL EXAM

Comments

  1. What you are doing is combining type casts with unary operators.

    So let's see:

    First, you have the value -1, which you cast to the type long.

    Then, you perform the unary operation +, which doesn't change the value, so you still have (long) -1.

    Then, you cast it to int, so we now have int -1. Then, you use unary operator -, so we have -(-1), which is 1.

    Then you cast it to char, so we have char 1. Then, you use unary operator +, so you still have 1.

    Finally, the value is cast to byte, so you have byte 1. And then it is once again (implicitly) cast to int.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The various (<type>) parts are just casting between various types. So what happens is, reading from the right, 1 -> -1 -> (long)-1 -> (int)-1 -> -(int)-1 = 1 -> (char)1) -> (byte)1 which then gets cast to an int during the assignment. At no point does the type cast result in effective change of the value, so the entire first line is equivalent to int i = 1;.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This goes right to left. -1 gets cast to long. Then the + prefix is applied (which has no effect), and it's cast to int. Then the - gets applied (changing it to 1) and it gets cast to char. Lastly, the + prefix is applied (which still has no effect) and it's cast to byte.

    ReplyDelete
  4. lets add parenthesis:

    int i = ((byte) + ((char) - ((int) + ((long) (- 1)))));
    System.out.println(i);


    basically this is just a series of casts and unary operators (+ does nothing, - negates)

    the full program flow is in luiscubal's answer

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Android emulator

I have a 2.67 GHz Celeron processor, 1.21 GB of RAM on a x86 Windows XP Professional machine. My understanding is that the Android emulator should start fairly quickly on such a machine, but for me it does not. I have followed all instructions in setting up the IDE, SDKs, JDKs and such and have had some success in staring the emulator quickly but is very particulary. How can I, if possible, fix this problem?