Skip to main content

Typo produces unexpected results in PHP


Just found a piece of my code that had one original typo in it.




$msg = "Some text";
$msg .= " some more text";
$msg .+ " yet more text!";
$msg .= " last text";



Notice the .+ that should be .= . What surprises me is that the code ran without producing any error, warning or notice and the output was:



Some text some more text last text



I was wondering why it did that. I know full well what .= and += are but how is .+ interpreted especially since there is no equal sign.


Source: Tips4allCCNA FINAL EXAM

Comments

  1. There's no .+ operator, so that is . followed by +.

    You're building an expression that consists of $msg concatenated with the result of applying unary + to " yet more text!" (which is 0 due to the cast to integer) ... and then discarding the whole thing because you're not doing anything with the result.

    $msg .+ " yet more text!";
    $msg . +" yet more text!"; // 1. PHP doesn't care about the spacing
    $msg . 0; // 2. Conversion to int from unary `+`
    $msg . "0"; // 3. Coersion to string for concatenation
    // 4. Nothing done with value


    It's perfectly valid; it just doesn't do anything useful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The + gets interpreted as a unary plus. PHP casts the string into an integer with the value 0 and concatenates it with $msg. However you do not assign $msg anything on that line, so $msg won't be changed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This works because the . is the concatenation operator, and + is the addition operator.

    The line got interpreted like this:

    $msg . (+" yet more text!");


    The expression +" yet more text!" converts the string to an int (0 in this case as when PHP converts a string to an int, it stops at the 1st non-number character). It then concated the 0 to $msg, and ignored the result.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Android emulator

I have a 2.67 GHz Celeron processor, 1.21 GB of RAM on a x86 Windows XP Professional machine. My understanding is that the Android emulator should start fairly quickly on such a machine, but for me it does not. I have followed all instructions in setting up the IDE, SDKs, JDKs and such and have had some success in staring the emulator quickly but is very particulary. How can I, if possible, fix this problem?