Skip to main content

Difference between code before and after super()


Look at the sample codes below




@Override
protected void onPause() {
...some code here...
super.onPause();
}



and




@Override
protected void onPause() {
super.onPause();
...some code here...
}



When I asked about differences in code, I did not mean about the flow of execution, which is abvious.



So what is the real difference between these codes? When is it advised to use your code before super() call, and when to use your code after super() call? I guess there are situations when this does matter.


Source: Tips4allCCNA FINAL EXAM

Comments

  1. You should not place any of your code before super.onPause(), cause this method lets the system do what it needs to do to properly pause your application. Any code you want to execute in the onPause() callback should be placed after the call to super.onPause(). Hope this helps.

    Quote from Activities:


    Note: Your implementation of these lifecycle methods must always call the superclass implementation before doing any work, as shown in the examples above.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've never faced any problems calling the super methods before my code and I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have faced any problems if I had called the super methods after my code. But usually super classes instances must be initialized before and deinitialized after subclasses. So ideally you should run your code after calling the super in onCreate(), onStart(), onRestart() and onResume() and before in onPause(), onStop() and onDestroy().

    But one more time. All this code is executed on the UI thread so the order of your code doesn't make great sense excluding some rare cases. But the best idea is to read the source code and to understand how it works and what really happens.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Had to chip in with this link to a thread with an identical subject:

    super.onResume() at beginning or end of method? Does it matter?

    Note the quote from Dianne Hackborn

    Yeah this is a good pattern. In most cases it probably doesn't matter, but
    it's a general rule: during any kind of initialization, let the super class
    do their work first; during any kind of finalization, you do your work
    first.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is this Javascript much *slower* than its jQuery equivalent?

I have a HTML list of about 500 items and a "filter" box above it. I started by using jQuery to filter the list when I typed a letter (timing code added later): $('#filter').keyup( function() { var jqStart = (new Date).getTime(); var search = $(this).val().toLowerCase(); var $list = $('ul.ablist > li'); $list.each( function() { if ( $(this).text().toLowerCase().indexOf(search) === -1 ) $(this).hide(); else $(this).show(); } ); console.log('Time: ' + ((new Date).getTime() - jqStart)); } ); However, there was a couple of seconds delay after typing each letter (particularly the first letter). So I thought it may be slightly quicker if I used plain Javascript (I read recently that jQuery's each function is particularly slow). Here's my JS equivalent: document.getElementById('filter').addEventListener( 'keyup', function () { var jsStart = (new Date).getTime()...

Is it possible to have IF statement in an Echo statement in PHP

Thanks in advance. I did look at the other questions/answers that were similar and didn't find exactly what I was looking for. I'm trying to do this, am I on the right path? echo " <div id='tabs-".$match."'> <textarea id='".$match."' name='".$match."'>". if ($COLUMN_NAME === $match) { echo $FIELD_WITH_COLUMN_NAME; } else { } ."</textarea> <script type='text/javascript'> CKEDITOR.replace( '".$match."' ); </script> </div>"; I am getting the following error message in the browser: Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_IF Please let me know if this is the right way to go about nesting an IF statement inside an echo. Thank you.