Skip to main content

ExpandableListView - hide indicator for groups with no children



In an ExpandableListView , is there a way to hide the group indicator for groups with no children?





Source: Tips4all

Comments

  1. The android:groupIndicator property takes a state enabled drawable. That is, you can set different image for different states.

    When the group has no children, the corresponding state is 'state_empty'

    See these reference links:
    http://developer.android.com/reference/android/widget/ExpandableListView.html#attr_android:groupIndicator

    http://developer.android.com/reference/android/R.attr.html#state_empty

    For state_empty, you can set a different image which is not confusing, or, simply use transparent color to display nothing...

    Add this item in your stateful drawable along with others....

    <item android:state_empty="true" android:drawable="@android:color/transparent"/>


    So, your statelist can be like this:

    <selector xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android">
    <item android:state_empty="true" android:drawable="@android:color/transparent"/>
    <item android:state_expanded="true" android:drawable="@drawable/my_icon_max" />
    <item android:drawable="@drawable/my_icon_min" />
    </selector>


    In case you are using an ExpandableListActivity, you can set the groupindicator in onCreate as follows:

    getExpandableListView().setGroupIndicator(getResources().getDrawable(R.drawable.my_group_statelist));


    I have tested this to be working.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As mentioned in a different answer, since Android treats an un-expanded list group as empty, the icon is not drawn even if the group has children.

    This link solved the problem for me:
    http://mylifewithandroid.blogspot.com/2011/06/hiding-group-indicator-for-empty-groups.html

    Basically you have to set the default drawable as transparent, move the drawable into your group view as an ImageView and toggle the image in your adapter.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is this Javascript much *slower* than its jQuery equivalent?

I have a HTML list of about 500 items and a "filter" box above it. I started by using jQuery to filter the list when I typed a letter (timing code added later): $('#filter').keyup( function() { var jqStart = (new Date).getTime(); var search = $(this).val().toLowerCase(); var $list = $('ul.ablist > li'); $list.each( function() { if ( $(this).text().toLowerCase().indexOf(search) === -1 ) $(this).hide(); else $(this).show(); } ); console.log('Time: ' + ((new Date).getTime() - jqStart)); } ); However, there was a couple of seconds delay after typing each letter (particularly the first letter). So I thought it may be slightly quicker if I used plain Javascript (I read recently that jQuery's each function is particularly slow). Here's my JS equivalent: document.getElementById('filter').addEventListener( 'keyup', function () { var jsStart = (new Date).getTime()...

Is it possible to have IF statement in an Echo statement in PHP

Thanks in advance. I did look at the other questions/answers that were similar and didn't find exactly what I was looking for. I'm trying to do this, am I on the right path? echo " <div id='tabs-".$match."'> <textarea id='".$match."' name='".$match."'>". if ($COLUMN_NAME === $match) { echo $FIELD_WITH_COLUMN_NAME; } else { } ."</textarea> <script type='text/javascript'> CKEDITOR.replace( '".$match."' ); </script> </div>"; I am getting the following error message in the browser: Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_IF Please let me know if this is the right way to go about nesting an IF statement inside an echo. Thank you.