Skip to main content

Invoking variable-arity methods with Java reflection?



I would like to understand what might be going on with invoking variable-arity methods using Java reflection. Let's say we have a simple method:







void doAllTheThings(Object ... things) {

// ...which does something with all the things...

}







And we want to invoke it dynamically, so we grab the method through reflection:







Method doItAll = Superklass.getDeclaredMethod("doAllTheThings", Object[].class);







And pass in an array:







Object[] allTheThings = new Object[] { "abc", true, 15 };

doItAll.invoke(allTheThings);







Now, this doesn't seem to work quite like my intuition had figured; in particular, I seem to be getting various shades of IllegalArgumentException when I try invoking a method with varargs like this.





There's clearly something I'm missing here. My guess is this is related somehow to how the variables get marshalled into the varargs. I've found this four year old blog post which seems to be talking about the same issue , but am unable to reproduce the 'successful' case there. Any thoughts on what might be going on here?


Comments

  1. You need to pass in an Object[][] in this case:

    Object[] allTheThings = new Object[] { "abc", true, 15 };
    doItAll.invoke(o, new Object[]{allTheThings});


    The reason is that the single things parameter is converted by the compiler into a single parameter of type Object[], and invoke takes an array with the values of the parameters.

    Consider a method with more parameters to make it clearer:

    void doMoreThings(Foo bar, Object ... things) { ... }

    Object[] allTheThings = new Object[] { "abc", true, 15 };
    doMore.invoke(o, new Object[]{new Foo(), allTheThings});


    invoke is itself declared to take varargs, so you can let the compiler create the outer array for you. But it won't do this if you pass an Object[], because it thinks you already did that. So just hide that fact from the compiler:

    doItAll.invoke(o, (Object)allTheThings);
    doMore.invoke(o, new Foo(), allTheThings);


    Note the cast in the first line, now the compiler does not now anymore that there is already an array, so it creates one. In the second line this is not needed, because the compiler has no other chance anyway.

    Edit:
    Note that your code does not even compile because you missed to pass an instance of the class with the doAllTheThings method to invoke (I named it o in my code).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Android emulator

I have a 2.67 GHz Celeron processor, 1.21 GB of RAM on a x86 Windows XP Professional machine. My understanding is that the Android emulator should start fairly quickly on such a machine, but for me it does not. I have followed all instructions in setting up the IDE, SDKs, JDKs and such and have had some success in staring the emulator quickly but is very particulary. How can I, if possible, fix this problem?

CCNA 3 Final Exam => latest version

1 . Which security protocol or measure would provide the greatest protection for a wireless LAN? WPA2 cloaking SSIDs shared WEP key MAC address filtering   2 . Refer to the exhibit. All trunk links are operational and all VLANs are allowed on all trunk links. An ARP request is sent by computer 5. Which device or devices will receive this message? only computer 4 computer 3 and RTR-A computer 4 and RTR-A computer 1, computer 2, computer 4, and RTR-A computer 1, computer 2, computer 3, computer 4, and RTR-A all of the computers and the router   3 . Refer to the exhibit. Hosts A and B, connected to hub HB1, attempt to transmit a frame at the same time but a collision occurs. Which hosts will receive the collision jamming signal? only hosts A and B only hosts A, B, and C only hosts A, B, C, and D only hosts A, B, C, and E   4 . Refer to the exhibit. Router RA receives a packet with a source address of 192.168.1.65 and a destination address of 192.168.1.161...