Skip to main content

ThreadPoolExecutor for running AbortableHttpRequest - how to call abort?



I'm running a networking service in android where I direct all my http requests to run and get callbacks from the service when the requests are complete. I run the requests in a ThreadPoolExecutor to limit the number of concurrent requests. As the requests run within the pool, they eventually create an HttpGet or HttpPost, both of which indirectly implement AbortableHttpRequest , which allows one to cancel the connection (say, if it's blocking for a long time).





If a user cancels a request, I'd like to somehow drill into the thread queue and call the abort routine for that request. If, for example, a web site is not responding and the user chooses to do something else, right now my only option is to wait for the standard 5 minute http timeout to occur for that hung request before that thread is freed up. If I could access the thread that has my request and call abort, that would free things up right away.





From what I can understand, it appears once my request has gone into the thread pool, it's a black box until it comes out the other end. Querying the queue will only hand back futures, which hides the runnable.





Is there a better approach for this? I'm fairly new to java and threading (I mostly do perl, which doesn't do threads very well at all).


Comments

  1. Just because you give a task to a thread pool executor doesn't mean you can't hold a reference on it. Keep a reference on the task, and if the user chooses to cancel it, then call abort on your task.

    public class MyAbortableRunnable implements Runnable {
    private final Object lock = new Object();
    private AbortableHttpRequest request;

    public void abort() {
    synchronized(lock) {
    if (request != null) {
    request.abort();
    }
    }
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
    ...
    // create the request
    synchronized(lock) {
    this.request = ...;
    }
    ...
    }
    }

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is this Javascript much *slower* than its jQuery equivalent?

I have a HTML list of about 500 items and a "filter" box above it. I started by using jQuery to filter the list when I typed a letter (timing code added later): $('#filter').keyup( function() { var jqStart = (new Date).getTime(); var search = $(this).val().toLowerCase(); var $list = $('ul.ablist > li'); $list.each( function() { if ( $(this).text().toLowerCase().indexOf(search) === -1 ) $(this).hide(); else $(this).show(); } ); console.log('Time: ' + ((new Date).getTime() - jqStart)); } ); However, there was a couple of seconds delay after typing each letter (particularly the first letter). So I thought it may be slightly quicker if I used plain Javascript (I read recently that jQuery's each function is particularly slow). Here's my JS equivalent: document.getElementById('filter').addEventListener( 'keyup', function () { var jsStart = (new Date).getTime()...

Is it possible to have IF statement in an Echo statement in PHP

Thanks in advance. I did look at the other questions/answers that were similar and didn't find exactly what I was looking for. I'm trying to do this, am I on the right path? echo " <div id='tabs-".$match."'> <textarea id='".$match."' name='".$match."'>". if ($COLUMN_NAME === $match) { echo $FIELD_WITH_COLUMN_NAME; } else { } ."</textarea> <script type='text/javascript'> CKEDITOR.replace( '".$match."' ); </script> </div>"; I am getting the following error message in the browser: Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_IF Please let me know if this is the right way to go about nesting an IF statement inside an echo. Thank you.