Skip to main content

Is Titanium 1.8 finally free from the memory starvation issue from release 1.6 and 1.7



Hi there Im new to mobile application development. I had developed Android apps using Java and is just starting to get the hang of Cocoa Touch and Objective C. Now I am curious on mobile web application development to create cross platform/device applications which would at least run on Android and iOS(Apple devices: iphone, ipad). I tried Titanium and developing applications with this framework seems very promising. Although it is very powerful, popular, mature, documented and very easy to learn I had doubts investing time and to commit on using this framework for my projects after reading this blog which many Titanium users seems to agree with Why you should stay away from appcelerators titanium .





It seems that release v1.6 sdk and v1.7 sdk have the issue which they describe, the negative comments stopped right after the v1.8 sdk release was out.





My question is, is Titanium v1.8 sdk free from the memory starvation issue and other issues which were discussed on the blog post?





Would you personally recommend this for production use? And by the way I am using the 1.0.7.201112152014 Titanium build does this use the 1.8 sdk? Thanks in advance.


Comments

  1. Take a close look at the progress of comments. It starts from people agreeing with him, and in the end everyone disagrees.

    You can select the SDK you wish in the tiapp.xml editor, which is embedded in Titanium Studio. You should indeed use 1.8.x

    The platform isn't, and probably never will be, memory issue free. But it also depends on how you build your app.

    Stay away as much as you can from includes. And also stay away from creating a window/view/etc. with a file as url in it, this causes most memory issues because it's in a different space.

    If you code well, you can use it perfectly without any issues.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Android emulator

I have a 2.67 GHz Celeron processor, 1.21 GB of RAM on a x86 Windows XP Professional machine. My understanding is that the Android emulator should start fairly quickly on such a machine, but for me it does not. I have followed all instructions in setting up the IDE, SDKs, JDKs and such and have had some success in staring the emulator quickly but is very particulary. How can I, if possible, fix this problem?

CCNA 1 Final Exam 2011 latest (hot hot hot)

  Hi! I have been posted content of ccna1 final exam (latest and only question.) I will post the answer and insert image on sunday. If you care, please subscribe your email an become a first person have full test content. Subcribe now  Some question  have not content because this question have images content. So that can you wait for me? SUNDAY 1. A user sees the command prompt: Router(config-if)# . What task can be performed at this mode? Reload the device. Perform basic tests. Configure individual interfaces. Configure individual terminal lines. 2. Refer to the exhibit. Host A attempts to establish a TCP/IP session with host C. During this attempt, a frame was captured with the source MAC address 0050.7320.D632 and the destination MAC address 0030.8517.44C4. The packet inside the captured frame has an IP source address 192.168.7.5, and the destination IP address is 192.168.219.24. At which point in the network was this packet captured? leaving host A leaving ATL leaving...