Skip to main content

get the true type prototype vs constructor?



I wanted to see the real type of [] .





I always thought that i can use the apply method or the constructor .





so i tried :





[].constructor ->(showed me) function Array() { [native code] }





and





[].constructor.constructor ->(showed me) function Function() { [native code] }





and





Object.prototype.toString.apply([]) ->(showed me) "[object Array]"








questions





1) Whom to believe ?





2)why line 2 is different ?


Comments

  1. 1) Whom to believe ?


    All of them. They're all correct


    2) why line 2 is different ?


    Because [].constructor is a function, and the .constructor of a function is the Function constructor.

    The last line is giving you the internal [[Class]] property of the object. It is only accessible by setting the object as the context of the generic toString() method, which is only available on Object.prototype.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is this Javascript much *slower* than its jQuery equivalent?

I have a HTML list of about 500 items and a "filter" box above it. I started by using jQuery to filter the list when I typed a letter (timing code added later): $('#filter').keyup( function() { var jqStart = (new Date).getTime(); var search = $(this).val().toLowerCase(); var $list = $('ul.ablist > li'); $list.each( function() { if ( $(this).text().toLowerCase().indexOf(search) === -1 ) $(this).hide(); else $(this).show(); } ); console.log('Time: ' + ((new Date).getTime() - jqStart)); } ); However, there was a couple of seconds delay after typing each letter (particularly the first letter). So I thought it may be slightly quicker if I used plain Javascript (I read recently that jQuery's each function is particularly slow). Here's my JS equivalent: document.getElementById('filter').addEventListener( 'keyup', function () { var jsStart = (new Date).getTime()...