Skip to main content

"javascript:void(0);' vs "return false' vs "preventDefault()'




When I want some link to not do anything but only respond to javascript actions what's the best way to avoid the link scrolling to the top edge of the page ?





I know several ways of doing it, they all seem to work fine :




<a href="javascript:void(0)">Hello</a>



or




<a id="hello" href="#">Hello</a>
<script type="text/javascript>
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#toto").click(function(){
//...
return false;
});
});
</script>



and even :




<a id="hello" href="#">Hello</a>
<script type="text/javascript>
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#toto").click(function(event){
event.preventDefault();
//...
});
});
</script>



Do you have any preference ? why ? in which conditions ?



PS: of course the above examples assume you're using jquery but there's equivalents for mootools or prototype.


Source: Tips4allCCNA FINAL EXAM

Comments

  1. Binding:


    javascript: URLs are a horror to be avoided at all times;
    inline event handler attributes aren't brilliant either, but OK for a bit of rapid development/testing;
    binding from script, leaving the markup clean, is typically considered a best practice. jQuery encourages this, but there is no reason you can't do it in any library or plain JS.


    Responses:


    In jQuery return false means both preventDefault and stopPropagation, so the meaning is different if you care about parent elements receiving the event notification;
    jQuery is hiding it here but preventDefault/stopPropagation have to be spelled differently in IE usually (returnValue/cancelBubble).


    However:


    You have a link that isn't a link. It doesn't link anywhere; it's an action. <a> isn't really the ideal markup for this. It'll go wrong if someone tries to middle-click it, or add it to bookmarks, or any of the other affordances a link has.
    For cases where it really does point to something, like when it opens/closes another element on the page, set the link to point to #thatelementsid and use unobtrusive scripting to grab the element ID from the link name. You can also sniff the location.hash on document load to open that element, so the link becomes useful in other contexts.
    Otherwise, for something that is purely an action, it would be best to mark it up like one: <input type="button"> or <button type="button">. You can style it with CSS to look like a link instead of a button if want.
    However there are some aspects of the button styling you can't quite get rid of in IE and Firefox. It's usually not significant, but if you really need absolute visual control a compromise is to use a <span> instead. You can add a tabindex property to make it keyboard-accessible in most browsers although this isn't really properly standardised. You can also detect keypresses like Space or Enter on it to activate. This is kind of unsatisfactory, but still quite popular (SO, for one, does it like this).
    Another possibility is <input type="image">. This has the accessibility advantages of the button with full visual control, but only for pure image buttons.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The only advantage that I can think of to using javascript:void(0) is that it will be supported even by the oldest browsers. That said, I would use one of the other unobtrusive approaches you have mentioned:


    For most uses, event.preventDefault() and return false can be used interchangeably.
    event.preventDefault() will prevent the page from reloading, as desired, but will allow the click event to bubble up to the parent. If you want to stop the bubbling, you can use it in conjunction with event.stopPropagation.
    return false will additionally stop the event from bubbling up to the parent.


    I say 'interchangeably' in the first point above because much of the time we do not care whether or not an event bubbles up to the parent(s). However, when do we need some fine-tuning, we should consider points two and three.

    Consider the following example:

    <div>Here is some text <a href="www.google.com">Click!</a></div>​

    $("a").click(function(e) {
    e.preventDefault();
    });

    $("div").click(function() {
    $(this).css("border", "1px solid red");
    });



    Clicking on the anchor will prevent the default action of the event from being triggered, so the browser will not redirect to www.google.com. However, the event will still 'bubble up' and cause the div's click event to fire, which will add a border around it. Add e.stopPropagation() or just return false and the div's click event will not fire. You can mess with it here: http://jsfiddle.net/cMKsN/1/

    ReplyDelete
  3. event.preventDefault() and return false; are one thing - they instruct the browser not to process the default action for the event (in this case, navigating to the href of the anchor tag that was clicked). href=javascript: and its ilk are something else - they're causing the default action to be 'do nothing'.

    It's a question of style. Do you want to do all your work in the onclick, or do you want to be able to put actions in both the onclick and the href and rely on the capabilities of the browser to modulate between the two?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dreamweaver uses a nice little trick by default that I've started using.

    <a href='javascript:;'></a>


    It's small, it doesn't trip and anchors and it's library agnostic.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'd rather not put JavaScript into the href because that's not what it's meant for. I prefer something like

    <a href="#" onclick="return handler();">Link</a>

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

[韓日関係] 首相含む大幅な内閣改造の可能性…早ければ来月10日ごろ=韓国

div not scrolling properly with slimScroll plugin

I am using the slimScroll plugin for jQuery by Piotr Rochala Which is a great plugin for nice scrollbars on most browsers but I am stuck because I am using it for a chat box and whenever the user appends new text to the boxit does scroll using the .scrollTop() method however the plugin's scrollbar doesnt scroll with it and when the user wants to look though the chat history it will start scrolling from near the top. I have made a quick demo of my situation http://jsfiddle.net/DY9CT/2/ Does anyone know how to solve this problem?

Why does this javascript based printing cause Safari to refresh the page?

The page I am working on has a javascript function executed to print parts of the page. For some reason, printing in Safari, causes the window to somehow update. I say somehow, because it does not really refresh as in reload the page, but rather it starts the "rendering" of the page from start, i.e. scroll to top, flash animations start from 0, and so forth. The effect is reproduced by this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/fYmnB/ Clicking the print button and finishing or cancelling a print in Safari causes the screen to "go white" for a sec, which in my real website manifests itself as something "like" a reload. While running print button with, let's say, Firefox, just opens and closes the print dialogue without affecting the fiddle page in any way. Is there something with my way of calling the browsers print method that causes this, or how can it be explained - and preferably, avoided? P.S.: On my real site the same occurs with Chrome. In the ex