Skip to main content

Eliminating Singletons


I've been doing a lot of reading about how using singleton classes is becoming bad practice in programming due to hidden dependencies, hard to test etc etc.



A lot of forum posts I have read have said that you can still maintain a singleton's main functionality of only allowing one instance without using the singleton pattern.



I wondered if anyone could give a practical example of this. A lot of posts have suggested using a factory class to create singleton instances where the dependencies are clearly shown. To me this just seems like taking multiple singletons and combining them into a single factory singleton which would have the same problems?


Source: Tips4allCCNA FINAL EXAM

Comments

  1. The problem with the "singleton pattern" is really not with the singleton itself, but with the inflexible static factory method in the singleton class. And I believe that even in the GoF book, this was considered an example of how a singleton could be accessed, not the definitive implementation model.


    A lot of posts have suggested using a factory class to create
    singleton instances where the dependencies are clearly shown. To me
    this just seems like taking multiple singletons and combining them
    into a single factory singleton which would have the same problems?


    The difference is that this single factory then becomes the single point where you maintain dependencies.

    And in fact, the generally accepted solution is to use a dependency injection framework like Spring or Guice which is basically such a single factory with a very powerful and flexible configuration mechanism which can do much more than just manage singletons.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The solution is usually to use dependency injection. This doesn't mean you have to have a framework, you just need to create instances and connect them together externally to your main code base. I use a module which depends on everything else which wires and configures all the components externally (to the components which are in other modules)

    Using dependency injection, you have a singleton whenever you only create one instance.

    Obviously, in tests, you can create many instances including sub-classes and mocks of interfaces.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A good practical example is the springframework. It creates beans by default as "singleton" (only one instance in the container), but there is no requirement that the programmer implement the pattern (private constructor, getInstance static method, etc.).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

[韓日関係] 首相含む大幅な内閣改造の可能性…早ければ来月10日ごろ=韓国

div not scrolling properly with slimScroll plugin

I am using the slimScroll plugin for jQuery by Piotr Rochala Which is a great plugin for nice scrollbars on most browsers but I am stuck because I am using it for a chat box and whenever the user appends new text to the boxit does scroll using the .scrollTop() method however the plugin's scrollbar doesnt scroll with it and when the user wants to look though the chat history it will start scrolling from near the top. I have made a quick demo of my situation http://jsfiddle.net/DY9CT/2/ Does anyone know how to solve this problem?

Why does this javascript based printing cause Safari to refresh the page?

The page I am working on has a javascript function executed to print parts of the page. For some reason, printing in Safari, causes the window to somehow update. I say somehow, because it does not really refresh as in reload the page, but rather it starts the "rendering" of the page from start, i.e. scroll to top, flash animations start from 0, and so forth. The effect is reproduced by this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/fYmnB/ Clicking the print button and finishing or cancelling a print in Safari causes the screen to "go white" for a sec, which in my real website manifests itself as something "like" a reload. While running print button with, let's say, Firefox, just opens and closes the print dialogue without affecting the fiddle page in any way. Is there something with my way of calling the browsers print method that causes this, or how can it be explained - and preferably, avoided? P.S.: On my real site the same occurs with Chrome. In the ex