Skip to main content

Why tack a protocol of NSObject to a protocol implementation



I have been seeing some code around that resembles the following:







@protocol MyProtocol <NSObject>

// write some methods.

@end







Is there any particular reason why MyProtocol conforms to the NSObject protocol? Isn't that rather redundant in that if you do something such as:







id <MyProtocol> foo; // foo here conforms to NSObject AND MyProtocol?







Just curious what the logic is.



Source: Tips4all

Comments

  1. I'm pretty sure the reason you would do this is to add the NSObject members (say like retain and release) to your protocol. Technically you can still send those messages anyways but you will get a compiler warning without it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When you declare a variable like

    id<MyProtocol> var;


    the Objective-C compiler knows only about the methods in MyProtocol and will thus produce a warning if you try to call any of the NSObject methods, such as -retain/-release, on that instance. Thus, Cocoa defines an NSObject protocol that mirrors the NSObject class and instance methods. By declaring that MyProtocol implements the NSObject protocol, you give the compiler a hint that all of the NSObject methods will be implemented by an instance that implements MyProtocol.

    Why is all this necessary? Objective-C allows objects to descend from any root class. In Cocoa, NSObject is the most common, but not the only root class. NSProxy is also a root class, for example. Therefore an instance of type id does not necessarily inherit NSObject's methods.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's also very handy when you have protocols that have @optional methods (e.g. "modern" Objective-C 2.0 delegates often use this technique) If you don't include the NSObject protocol, you'll get warnings when you try to call respondsToSelector: on the object.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've never done that in my code, but I could see the advantage to it. If you pass a parameter as id <SomeProtocol> you'll need to re-cast it if you want to call any of NSObject's methods on that object.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you use any of the NSObject protocol methods such as retain, release, class, classname, the compiler will give you warnings unless your Protocol also includes the NSObject protocol.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

[韓日関係] 首相含む大幅な内閣改造の可能性…早ければ来月10日ごろ=韓国

div not scrolling properly with slimScroll plugin

I am using the slimScroll plugin for jQuery by Piotr Rochala Which is a great plugin for nice scrollbars on most browsers but I am stuck because I am using it for a chat box and whenever the user appends new text to the boxit does scroll using the .scrollTop() method however the plugin's scrollbar doesnt scroll with it and when the user wants to look though the chat history it will start scrolling from near the top. I have made a quick demo of my situation http://jsfiddle.net/DY9CT/2/ Does anyone know how to solve this problem?

Why does this javascript based printing cause Safari to refresh the page?

The page I am working on has a javascript function executed to print parts of the page. For some reason, printing in Safari, causes the window to somehow update. I say somehow, because it does not really refresh as in reload the page, but rather it starts the "rendering" of the page from start, i.e. scroll to top, flash animations start from 0, and so forth. The effect is reproduced by this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/fYmnB/ Clicking the print button and finishing or cancelling a print in Safari causes the screen to "go white" for a sec, which in my real website manifests itself as something "like" a reload. While running print button with, let's say, Firefox, just opens and closes the print dialogue without affecting the fiddle page in any way. Is there something with my way of calling the browsers print method that causes this, or how can it be explained - and preferably, avoided? P.S.: On my real site the same occurs with Chrome. In the ex