Skip to main content

Why tack a protocol of NSObject to a protocol implementation



I have been seeing some code around that resembles the following:







@protocol MyProtocol <NSObject>

// write some methods.

@end







Is there any particular reason why MyProtocol conforms to the NSObject protocol? Isn't that rather redundant in that if you do something such as:







id <MyProtocol> foo; // foo here conforms to NSObject AND MyProtocol?







Just curious what the logic is.



Source: Tips4all

Comments

  1. I'm pretty sure the reason you would do this is to add the NSObject members (say like retain and release) to your protocol. Technically you can still send those messages anyways but you will get a compiler warning without it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When you declare a variable like

    id<MyProtocol> var;


    the Objective-C compiler knows only about the methods in MyProtocol and will thus produce a warning if you try to call any of the NSObject methods, such as -retain/-release, on that instance. Thus, Cocoa defines an NSObject protocol that mirrors the NSObject class and instance methods. By declaring that MyProtocol implements the NSObject protocol, you give the compiler a hint that all of the NSObject methods will be implemented by an instance that implements MyProtocol.

    Why is all this necessary? Objective-C allows objects to descend from any root class. In Cocoa, NSObject is the most common, but not the only root class. NSProxy is also a root class, for example. Therefore an instance of type id does not necessarily inherit NSObject's methods.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's also very handy when you have protocols that have @optional methods (e.g. "modern" Objective-C 2.0 delegates often use this technique) If you don't include the NSObject protocol, you'll get warnings when you try to call respondsToSelector: on the object.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've never done that in my code, but I could see the advantage to it. If you pass a parameter as id <SomeProtocol> you'll need to re-cast it if you want to call any of NSObject's methods on that object.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you use any of the NSObject protocol methods such as retain, release, class, classname, the compiler will give you warnings unless your Protocol also includes the NSObject protocol.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Android emulator

I have a 2.67 GHz Celeron processor, 1.21 GB of RAM on a x86 Windows XP Professional machine. My understanding is that the Android emulator should start fairly quickly on such a machine, but for me it does not. I have followed all instructions in setting up the IDE, SDKs, JDKs and such and have had some success in staring the emulator quickly but is very particulary. How can I, if possible, fix this problem?

CCNA 1 Final Exam 2011 latest (hot hot hot)

  Hi! I have been posted content of ccna1 final exam (latest and only question.) I will post the answer and insert image on sunday. If you care, please subscribe your email an become a first person have full test content. Subcribe now  Some question  have not content because this question have images content. So that can you wait for me? SUNDAY 1. A user sees the command prompt: Router(config-if)# . What task can be performed at this mode? Reload the device. Perform basic tests. Configure individual interfaces. Configure individual terminal lines. 2. Refer to the exhibit. Host A attempts to establish a TCP/IP session with host C. During this attempt, a frame was captured with the source MAC address 0050.7320.D632 and the destination MAC address 0030.8517.44C4. The packet inside the captured frame has an IP source address 192.168.7.5, and the destination IP address is 192.168.219.24. At which point in the network was this packet captured? leaving host A leaving ATL leaving...