Skip to main content

Does storing large sessions slow down response time and server



I am in the process of creating a Facebook App for my website which includes functionality that requires the users friends list.





Retrieving the friends is no problem, what I am struggling to decide, is how to store them.







  1. Option 1 - Store the users in my MySQL database, I have opted not to go for this as my database will become very heavy, very quickly. In addition, I will need to create a table for each individual Facebook user!





  2. Option 2 - Store the Facebook friends array in a session which is updated every half an hour to ensure new friends are included. Ignore the fact that the session updates every half an hour, is it a bad idea to store, what can be a very large array, within a session?







The website is likely to be receiving high volumes of traffic, and will therefore be storing a lot of these sessions.





Although I am an experienced developer, I am not overly experienced with sessions in these circumstances. I would simply like to know whether or not this is a bad idea?





Just to give you a little info on the typical friends array:





  1. Each array is multidimensional in the format {0[uid:1,name:Jo Bloggs,picture:test.jpg],1...}



  2. A friends list typically ranges from 100 items to 5000 items, although averaging around 700. These are not small!







If this is a bad method for storing the friends, what other options (excluding MySQL) are there?





Do sessions have an effect on memory (RAM) usage?


Comments

  1. For your requirements, I highly recommend installing MemCacheD on your server. See: http://memcached.org/ for more information.

    Session is only for the current user logged in, so sharing the information would be hard between sessions. Also when the session goes away, so does the user data.

    For memcached data is stored in key/value pairs.

    So for a key, you could use facebook ID, and for the value, a serialized object of user data.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

[韓日関係] 首相含む大幅な内閣改造の可能性…早ければ来月10日ごろ=韓国

div not scrolling properly with slimScroll plugin

I am using the slimScroll plugin for jQuery by Piotr Rochala Which is a great plugin for nice scrollbars on most browsers but I am stuck because I am using it for a chat box and whenever the user appends new text to the boxit does scroll using the .scrollTop() method however the plugin's scrollbar doesnt scroll with it and when the user wants to look though the chat history it will start scrolling from near the top. I have made a quick demo of my situation http://jsfiddle.net/DY9CT/2/ Does anyone know how to solve this problem?

Why does this javascript based printing cause Safari to refresh the page?

The page I am working on has a javascript function executed to print parts of the page. For some reason, printing in Safari, causes the window to somehow update. I say somehow, because it does not really refresh as in reload the page, but rather it starts the "rendering" of the page from start, i.e. scroll to top, flash animations start from 0, and so forth. The effect is reproduced by this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/fYmnB/ Clicking the print button and finishing or cancelling a print in Safari causes the screen to "go white" for a sec, which in my real website manifests itself as something "like" a reload. While running print button with, let's say, Firefox, just opens and closes the print dialogue without affecting the fiddle page in any way. Is there something with my way of calling the browsers print method that causes this, or how can it be explained - and preferably, avoided? P.S.: On my real site the same occurs with Chrome. In the ex